Gun Guys Emails
Our Newsletter
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Tactical
  • Firearms
  • Videos
Reading: Virginia Dems accused of illegally ‘steamrolling’ state law that could upend redistricting crusade
Share
Search
Gun Guys EmailsGun Guys Emails
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Tactical
  • Firearms
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
2025 © Gun Guy Emails. All Rights Reserved.
News

Virginia Dems accused of illegally ‘steamrolling’ state law that could upend redistricting crusade

Wayne Park
Last updated: April 18, 2026 4:17 pm
Last updated: April 18, 2026 4 Min Read
Share
Virginia Dems accused of illegally ‘steamrolling’ state law that could upend redistricting crusade
SHARE

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Virginia voters are set to decide a redistricting referendum Tuesday, even as a high-stakes legal challenge before the state’s Supreme Court argues the amendment should be invalidated because it was pushed through an unlawfully extended legislative session.

The case centers on whether lawmakers violated the Virginia Constitution by keeping the special session open for nearly two years to pass the redistricting measure, a move critics say was an abuse of legislative authority. The measure, if it passes Tuesday and survives state Supreme Court scrutiny, would reshape the state’s congressional map so that Democrats have a 10-1 advantage in the upcoming midterms.

“The voters are the first hope that we have, and the best one,” Jason Snead, executive director of Honest Elections Project Action, told Fox News Digital, warning that if the referendum passes, the Supreme Court decision could be “the last chance” before the next census to challenge the map.

VIRGINIA DEM ADMITS REDISTRICTING PUSH AIMS TO ‘STOP TRUMP’, NOT ABOUT ‘FAIRNESS’

Snead’s group this week submitted a brief to Virginia’s highest court making the case that the legislative special session was improperly extended.

“If you look at what the Constitution of Virginia requires … it’s very clear that what happened here was an illegally extended special session that essentially turned a part-time legislature into a full-time legislature,” Snead said, noting how the amicus brief argues the lawmakers kept the session open for nearly two years.

Virginia Democrats, led by Gov. Abigail Spanberger and House Speaker Don Scott, passed an amendment this year that they argued allowed them to bypass the typical redistricting process in the state to shift the current 6-5 map to 10-1. Scott told reporters in February the move was a direct response to national redistricting fights playing out across the country.

NEW POLL REVEALS SPANBERGER’S POPULARITY IS PLUMMETING AMID BACKLASH OVER GERRYMANDERING

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger speaking at a podium during State of the Union rebuttal

“This is about leveling the playing field across the country. Republicans are gerrymandering maps to override the will of the voters,” Scott said. “We just saw it in Texas, North Carolina and Missouri. At Donald Trump’s direction they’re manipulating election maps because they know they can’t win on their agenda in 2026. … A 10-1 map levels the playing field.”

Democrats have argued to the Supreme Court that the General Assembly has broad constitutional authority to manage its own legislative sessions and procedures, including extending a special session, and that nothing in the Virginia Constitution explicitly prohibits how this particular session was handled. 

The Honest Elections Project’s brief argues otherwise.

“If you look at what the law requires, it’s very clear that Governor Spanberger and her allies are steamrolling the process to try to launch a power grab,” Snead said

SPANBERGER ONCE BLASTED GERRYMANDERING AND NOW BACKS AMENDMENT CRITICS SAY COULD ERASE VIRGINIA GOP

Virginia State Capitol building in Richmond during inauguration ceremony

The Supreme Court decided in March to allow the referendum vote to move forward while it considers Republicans’ arguments challenging how the map amendment was passed by way of a special session.

“It is the process, not the outcome, of this effort that we may ultimately have to address,” the state’s highest court found. “Issuing an injunction to keep Virginians from the polls is not the proper way to make this decision.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case April 27 and a decision could come anytime after that.

Fox News Digital reached out to Spanberger’s and Scott’s offices for comment.

Read the full article here

Share This Article
Facebook X Email Copy Link Print
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News & Research

Walz rips Trump and Vance in Europe, says ‘feeble-minded, trigger-happy president’ has no exit plan for Iran

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz slammed President Donald Trump and Vice President JD…

News April 18, 2026

US Navy releases photos of ‘fresh meals,’ pushes back on reports of food shortages on Middle East warships

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! The U.S. Navy released photos Saturday of "fresh meals" being served onboard…

News April 18, 2026

Kagan screamed so loudly at liberal ally after Dobbs leak the ‘wall was shaking,’ book claims

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! FIRST ON FOX: Justice Elena Kagan’s frustrations boiled over in the aftermath…

News April 18, 2026

Trump signs executive order directing FDA to review psychedelics designated as breakthrough therapy drugs

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! President Donald Trump signed an executive order Saturday that he said "directs…

News April 18, 2026
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact Us
  • 2025 © Gun Guy Emails. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?